//
Change Management

Caprivi Consultancy

Change Management

Change is the law of life. And those who look only to the past or present are certain to miss the future. – John F. Kennedy

If you’re in a bad situation, don’t worry it’ll change. If you are in a good situation, don’t worry it’ll change.John A. Simone, Sr.

What is Change Management?

Change = the act of transformation.

In the current competitive and challenging business environment, organisations need to change on a fairly contant basis to survive (remains competitive) and to fullfill their mission. Changing an organisation involves integrating many variables that range from processes to people.

Organisational/Business Change, whatever format, involves either major restructuring (reconstruction) change, revolutionary change, adoption/adaptive change (adaptation), incremental change (evolution), or a modification how the organisation measures performance is almost always disruptive and not always easy to implement. Change leads people on a different path, requiring new skills and sometimes different behaviours.

Change Management can be a balancing act because change can be intensily personal and may require many people in the organisation to think, believe, feel or do something different. Leaders must identify and understand the factors (compelling reasons) that are driving the organisational/business change process so that they can define the furture (To Be) business model and subsequently develop the appropriate change plan, roadmap, change strategy, mindset models & frameworks for the change process.

The Organisational Model for Sustainable Change requires consideration of ther entire operation (organism), that includes hardware, that represents the work of the organisation, and the software that represents the people and support structures required to carry out the work. The Mindset Model will assist with assessing the whole organisation from each of the different perspectives to ensure the majority of the considerations & concerns are addressed appropriately.

A Compelling Vision is a key element of the change programme, change communication plans and the compelling vision for change makes the future (To Be) business model more credible to the staff and stakeholders. Without a compelling vission, the change effort can easily dissolve into a list of confusing, incompatible, and time consuming projects that go into the wrong direction or work at cross-purposes. Vision is a basic theme or shared value that is important and meaningfull to the staff in the organisation.

TIP; Don’t undercommunicate the purpose of the change and actions planned. Without credible information, and sufficient information, people can become anxious and won’t be motivated to change. Don’t impose solutions developed by others, instead involve the change targets (people most affected by the change) in the development of these solutions.

Readiness for Change; A predisposition to welcome and embrace change. (Huczynski and Buchanan, 2007)

Resistance to Change; An inability, or unwillingness to discuss or to accept changes that are perceived to be damaging or threatening to the individual. (Huczynski and Buchanan, 2007)

Change Agents; These are the people responsible for directing, organising and facilitating change in organisations. (Burns, Bernard, 2009)

Organisation Development (OD); This is an approach to change based on the original work of Kurt Lewin with regards to improving the effectiveness of human side of the organisation through participative change programmes. (Burns, Bernard, 2009)

Participation; The process of involving people in decison-making and change activities within organisations. (Burns, Bernard, 2009)

Activity Planning; This involved constructing a schedule or “road map” for a change programme, citing the main activities and events that must occur if the change is to be successful. (Burns, Bernard, 2009)s, Bernard, 2009)

Group Dynamics; This concept refers to the forces operating in groups. It is concerned with what gives rise to these forces, their consequences and how to modify them. Group Dynamics stresses that group behaviour, rather than that of individuals, should be the main focus of change. (Burns, Bernard, 2009)

Planned Change; Term (by Kurt Lewin)  to distinguish change that was consciously embarked upon and planned by the organisation, as opposed to types of change that might come about by accident or by impulse or that might be forced on an organisation. Lewin’s Planned Approach to Change consists of four (4) interrelated elements; (i) Field Theory, (ii) Group Dynamics, (iii) Action Research, (iv) Tree-step Model of Change. (Burns, Bernard, 2009)

Paradigm; This is the way of looking at interpreting the world, a framework of basic assumptions, theories and models that are commonly and strongly accepted and shared within a particular field of activity at a particular point in time. (Burns, Bernard, 2009)

♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦

Change Management Frameworks & Models

  • Capability to Change
  • Capacity to Change
  • Change Agent Competencies
  • Drivers for Change
  • Change Planning & Roadmap
  • Consultations & Negotiations
  • Communications & Preparation
  • Organisational Structures
  • Change Implementation Approaches
  • Change Governance, Management & Change Control
  • Barriers & Resistance To Change
  • Cultural Change
  • Organisational Change Management
  • Organisational Project Management

Subsequent to the extensive literature study, a comprehensive understanding was formed of the various conventional organisational change management methods/frameworks being used.

The best, most relevant and unique elements from each of the listed models were extracted to “build” a new ideally suited framework that will cover all aspects necessary for a comprehensive change management maturity model.

For more information about the change frameworks, change maturity models, tools/templates, tips and change management advise & support, please use the Contact Details mentioned on the Contact Us page.

♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦

Best Practices – Change Management

Best Practice Identification

The following conventional frameworks and models are described in academic literature as models that can be used to manage the change process:

  • Six Steps for effective Change [Senior & Swailes (2010)]
  • Six Steps to Managing Change [Harvard Business Review (2009)]
  • Ten Steps to Successful Change Management [Vukotic G. (2011)]
  • Eight Steps to Successful Change [Kotter J. (1996)]
  • Ten Commandments for Executing Change [Kanter et al (1992)]
  • Determinants of Successful Change [Burnes B. (2009)]
  • Nine Key Steps in Strategic Fitness Process [Beer P. (2011)]
  • Six Steps to Cultural Change [Cummings & Worley (2001)]

Evaluation Frameworks

The following frameworks can be used for evaluation purposes:

  • DICE Framework [Sirkin et al (2005) HBR]
  • McKinsey’s 7-S Framework [Waterman & Peters (1980)]

♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦

See also Blog;

♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦

Discussion

One thought on “Change Management

  1. Philworldwide's avatar

    Change Management: A New Model for Organizations Implementing Change

    http://www.emergencymgmt.com/training/Change-Management-Model-Organizations-Implementing-Change.html?goback=%2Egde_80342_member_168302082

    The one thing that dominates our modern lives is change. Nothing is static anymore and change is constant. To keep up with the pace of change, governments and businesses are implementing new processes, procedures, equipment, software and more. It’s reported that nearly 70 percent of change efforts fail.

    Victory Grady is a change expert and the co-author of The Pivot Point: Success in Organizational Change. Grady completed her doctoral studies at George Washington University in May 2005. Her dissertation focused on the inherent loss of stability suffered by organizations introducing and implementing organizational change initiatives. The research resulted in a validated model explaining the tendency of individuals, often subconsciously, to struggle, resist and potentially disrupt the organizational change initiative. She responded below to a series of questions posed to her about change management.

    Question: Are human beings naturally resistant to change?

    Answer: Maybe. We certainly tend to relax and get comfortable once we learn a certain formula for success or a behavior that works for us.

    But we also are part of a dynamic environment that requires us to adapt and change to stay competitive in the global marketplace. Times and people do change, and we know deep inside that sometimes, we have to get with the program too.

    Do individuals deal with change differently? How does this impact organizational change?

    Yes, at least in some ways. Each and every one of us deals with change in a special way.

    Organizational change is particularly challenging because some people learn and adapt quickly, while others take more time, and may require help from management, leadership and other employees. Special awareness and actions are needed to make sure no one gets left behind.

    Is there a standard process or way to effect change in an organization?

    No. The best process is tailored to the company or organization. Each organization, whether small or large, is unique. The individuals are also unique, and the changes they are being asked to make are unique. So the best process will be one that takes their special needs into account and is carefully designed to help them in the ways that will maximize success.

    What is the most crucial issue you see that organizations fail to address?

    Change initiatives can fail for many reasons. But one of the most common causes of failure is that they do not adequately address the role and the needs of individuals who are going through the change and the objects they are attached to.

    What is the Pivot Point? Why is it important?

    The Pivot Point is that place in time and space when individuals (the employees) successfully abandon the old and adjust to the new.

    If you look at The Pivot Point you see that each person is attached or linked to “objects” in the workplace that they lean on or attach to for support to complete the task, work or the project before them.

    An object can be a person, a technology, a system, a location, a process, familiar equipment, even an abstract concept or idea — anything that serves to provide an individual employee with a sense of consistency and stability.

    How does understanding the pivot point help organizations go through change?

    People do what they are familiar and comfortable with. To make change successfully each person must be trained to do new things in new ways. People struggle with changes until they become comfortable and confident with the new methods, systems or changing circumstances.
    ———-2——————
    It’s not just the addition of new, but it is also the loss of the old.

    To achieve change in an organization, employees must leave those familiar things behind, and at the same time learn how to act and function in a new way.

    What does this mean for organizations?

    Management and leadership must realize that the individual employees are the most important element. The employees are the organization. That is the bottom line.

    Change that is simply imposed will not be effective without the individuals being able to succeed with the change in place.

    Can you measure how people adapt to change?

    Yes. It is best to first assess how an organization performs. Here’s a simple example: Look at one organization. First identify how long it takes to get certain piece of work done? What does it cost to do the work? How much money does the organization make?

    Now implement a new technology (give everyone a smartphone) and train them how to use it.

    Now how long does it take to get the same work done? Did you save any money? Did you make more money or less money?

    Is everyone using the smartphones well enough? Are they trained to communicate and make use of all the time-saving features?

    This is a simple example. The changes that organizations make are usually more complicated than this.

    You can analyze organizational effectiveness gains or losses from changes that managers and leaders make, and it can make a tremendous difference in how change is achieved.

    What is the key to success in effecting organizational change?

    The key to the success is identifying metrics that matter so that the organization can monitor and see exactly where people are adapting and where they need help.

    These metrics allow management to figure out what needs to be done to ensure that individuals get the help, the training or the support they need to make it through the pivot points each person encounters. These measurements can be real time and adjusted to meet each organization’s needs.

    Posted by Philworldwide | 15/10/2012, 11:13 am

Leave a reply to Philworldwide Cancel reply

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started